Honda and Nissan Announce Merger to Become Third Largest Automaker

New Holding Company Will Consolidate Operations, Accelerate Innovation, and Target EV and Autonomous Markets

Honda (TSE: 7267) and Nissan (TSE: 7201) are merging to become the world’s third biggest carmaker by 2026. The two companies announced the plans through a memorandum of understanding (MOU). The companies want to strengthen their position in the rapidly changing automotive industry that now includes electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous driving.

Merger Details

The merger will create a new holding company and is expected to be completed by August 2026. The new company will have annual sales of almost $238.9 billion and net income of $7.2 billion. Honda’s enterprise value (EV) is currently almost $86 billion and Nissan’s is over $52 billion.

Honda will appoint the majority of the board members of the holding company to ensure a single direction. The combined global sales of the new company will be over 8 million units, making it a serious competitor to South Korean car manufacturers Hyundai (KOSE: A005380) and Kia (KOSE:A000270).

The companies are confident that merging will enable them to combine their resources and embrace new technologies more quickly. This merger is intended to enhance the sharing of manufacturing and research and development (R&D) resources, optimize production processes, and lower costs.

The goal is to simplify operations, boost efficiency, and enhance the competitiveness of the new company, especially in the expanding EV and autonomous driving sectors. Both companies have invested heavily in EVs and autonomous driving technology.

Industry Valuation Metrics

The auto industry’s valuation metrics have been volatile recently. Price-to-earnings ratios for major automakers range from 3x to 108x, reflecting market perceptions and investor interest in newer participants.

The Honda-Nissan deal, valued at over $138 billion based on their combined enterprise values, represents a significant consolidation.

Using an EV-to-Sales ratio to assess this valuation metric deal, for Honda and Nissan, their combined annual sales of $238.9  billion suggest an EV-to-sales ratio of about 0.6, which is relatively low for the sector, with a mean of 2.0x and a median of 0.9x (see Figure 1).

This could indicate potential value creation if synergies are realized. However, the merger value merger will depend on how well the companies execute their integration strategy. Investors seemed to approve the deal as both Honda and Nissan stocks were up on the news. That’s the market’s vote of confidence in the merger to grow and create value.

FIGURE 1: Auto Comp Table (click for a larger image)

eResearch - Automotive Comp Table - 2025-01-08
Sources: S&P Capital IQ; eResearch Corp.

Adding Mitsubishi to the Mix

The merger might be further complicated by the Mitsubishi Motors (TSE: 8058).

Mitsubishi is part of Nissan’s existing alliance and is considering becoming a part of the merged company. This decision could help expand the new entity’s global presence and introduce valuable technological expertise, opening doors for greater growth and innovation opportunities.

Why Now

Increasing competition from Chinese EV manufacturers and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), who are rapidly advancing in both technology and market share, are helping to fuel this deal. By pooling resources and expertise, Honda and Nissan aim to accelerate innovation, reduce costs, and deliver high-quality, cutting-edge products to consumers.

Challenges remain as Honda and Nissan face issues in key markets such as China and the US. Nissan’s restructuring plan involves cutting 9,000 jobs and scaling back global production by 20%. A coordinated approach will be important to overcome these hurdles and realize the merger’s full potential.

That’s why a strategic and coordinated approach is needed to navigate the complexities of the merger and succeed in the long term.

Final Thoughts

The proposed merger between Honda and Nissan could be a significant shift in the auto industry. By sharing technology, improving operations, and aligning their strategic objectives, the new entity has the potential to reshape competition and establish new benchmarks for innovation and quality.

As the merger unfolds, attention will focus on how the two companies manage the complexities of integration and leverage their combined strengths. Their success will depend on their ability to adapt to changing market conditions as their competitors won’t remain still.


Notes: All numbers in USD unless otherwise stated. The author of this report, and employees, consultants, and family of eResearch may own stock positions in companies mentioned in this article and may have been paid by a company mentioned in the article or research report. eResearch offers no representations or warranties that any of the information contained in this article is accurate or complete. Articles on eresearch.com are provided for general informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice nor does it constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities referred to. Individual circumstances and current events are critical to sound investment planning; anyone wishing to act on this information should consult with a financial advisor. The article may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and assumptions of the Company’s management as of the date made. They are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and other factors that could cause actual events/results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties, including those that the Company does not know about now or that it currently deems immaterial, may also adversely affect the Company’s business or any investment therein. Any projections given are principally intended for use as objectives and are not intended, and should not be taken, as assurances that the projected results will be obtained by the Company. The assumptions used may not prove to be accurate and a potential decline in the Company’s financial condition or results of operations may negatively impact the value of its securities. Please read eResearch’s full disclaimer.

About Chris Thompson 361 Articles
Chris Thompson is the President and Director of Equity Research at eResearch. He is a Professional Engineer and CFA Charterholder with a MBA in Investment Management and over 15 years of experience in software development, FinTech, telecommunications, and information technology. For the past 10 years, he has worked in the Capital Markets in Equity Research, M&A Investment Banking and Consulting in various sectors.